Explore Your 5 Universal Emotions With the Dalai Lama

The new Atlas of Emotions is an engaging online resource.

Emotions: we all got ‘em, but some of us choose to pay them more attention than others. Emotions are complex and capricious, which can make them difficult to understand, but there are universal truths about their origins and effects on daily life that can make grasping them a bit easier.

By Anthony Von Dari@VOP Today


The Dalai Lama, a compassionate preacher of inner peace who probably has a firmer hold on his emotions than most of us, has launched the Ekmans’ Atlas of Emotions, an online resource designed to help people better understand their emotions by uniting them under universal truths concluded from scientific data.

“This is not just for knowledge, but in order to create a happy human being.”

The Dalai Lama may be a religious leader, but his teachings about compassion and self-awareness are of great use to secular people, too. While the Dalai Lama would be overjoyed to learn that you subscribe to Buddhist beliefs, his overarching goal is to help everyone attain inner peace, religion aside.

The Atlas of Emotions was developed with American psychologist Dr. Paul Ekmanwith the hope that universal truths based on science would help religious and secular people make better sense of their emotions.

In a New York Times article announcing the launch of the Atlas of Emotions, the Dalai Lama asserts that everyone, regardless of religious beliefs or age, can benefit from exploring this “innerness.” “This is not just for knowledge, but in order to create a happy human being. “Happy family, happy community and, finally, happy humanity,” he said.

The Dalai Lama shaking hands with officials at Capitol Hill in 2014

The Dalai Lama shaking hands with officials at Capitol Hill in 2014

As the Dalai Lama isn’t exactly a technology whiz, he enlisted the help of Ekman and his daughter Eve, a postdoctoral scholar, to organize a distinct range of human emotions for $750,000.

Ekman — who assisted on Pixar’s Inside Out, an animated children’s movie with surprisingly mature themes about feelings — surveyed 149 scientists in an attempt to discern any consensus about human emotions, their triggers, and the moods they elicit.

While it was no easy task to get that many specialists to reach an agreement, Ekman was able to boil down the data into five basic “continents” of emotion: anger, fear, disgust, sadness, and enjoyment. On the site, each appears as a colorful, pulsing puddle on the front page of the Atlas.

The five continents of emotion

The five continents of emotion

There are plenty of therapeutic resources online, but the Atlas of Emotions boasts an enticing dichotomy that separates it from the rest: it’s driven by the Dalai Lama’s spiritual quest for inner peace but grounded in scientific data.

When it comes to the complexity of a quest like understanding our emotions, it’s helpful to have our approaches fall somewhere between intriguing spirituality and scientific truths. Oh, and it works just fine on your smartphone — just don’t look at it while in bed.

The different experiences that trigger the emotion of disgust

The different experiences that trigger the emotion of disgust

The goal of the Atlas of Emotions seems to extend outward, too: by learning more about ourselves, we can get a better grasp on the actions of the people we love and even those we clash with. It may feel as though our emotions are often riddled with mystery, but the Dalai Lama’s new emotional map is here to help. Debunk the mystery of you today.


Maybe here is someone never heard about Dalai Lama

(Wikipedia) The Dalai Lama /ˈdɑːl ˈlɑːmə/ (US), /ˌdæl ˈlɑːmə/ (UK) is a monk of the Gelug or “Yellow Hat” school of Tibetan Buddhism, the newest of the schools of Tibetan Buddhism founded by Je Tsongkhapa. The 14th and current Dalai Lama is Tenzin Gyatso.

The Dalai Lama is considered to be the successor in a line of tulkus who are believed to be incarnations ofAvalokiteśvara, the Bodhisattva of Compassion, called Chenrezig in Tibetan. The name is a combination of theMongolic word dalai meaning “ocean” (being the translation of the Tibetan name, ‘Gyatso’) and the Tibetan word བླ་མ་ (bla-ma) meaning “guru, teacher, mentor”. The Tibetan word “lama” corresponds to the better known Sanskrit word “guru“.

From 1642 until the 1950s (except for 1705 to 1750), the Dalai Lamas or their regents headed the Tibetan government (or Ganden Phodrang) in Lhasa which governed all or most of the Tibetan plateau with varying degrees of autonomy, up to complete sovereignty. This government also enjoyed the patronage and protection of firstly Mongol kings of theKhoshut and Dzungar Khanates (1642–1720) and then of the emperors of the Manchu-led Qing dynasty (1720–1912)

History

In Central Asian Buddhist countries, it has been widely believed for the last millennium that Avalokiteśvara, the bodhisattva of compassion, has a special relationship with the people of Tibet and intervenes in their fate by incarnating as benevolent rulers and teachers such as the Dalai Lamas. This is according to The Book of Kadam, the main text of the Kadampa school, to which the First Dalai Lama, Gendun Drup, first belonged. In fact, this text is said to have ‘laid the foundation’ for the Tibetans’ later identification of the Dalai Lamas as incarnations of Avalokiteśvara. It traces the legend of the bodhisattva’s incarnations as early Tibetan kings and emperors such as Songsten Gampo and later as Dromtönpa (1004-1064). This lineage has been extrapolated by Tibetans up to and including the Dalai Lamas.

Origins in myth and legend

Thus, according to such sources, an informal line of succession of the present Dalai Lamas as incarnations ofAvalokiteśvara stretches back much further than Gendun Drub. The Book of Kadam, the compilation of Kadampateachings largely composed around discussions between the Indian sage Atisa (980-1054) and his Tibetan host and chief disciple Dromtönpa and ‘Tales of the Previous Incarnations of Arya Avalokiteśvara’, nominate as many as sixty persons prior to Gendun Drub who are enumerated as earlier incarnations of Avalokiteśvara and predecessors in the same lineage leading up to him. In brief, these include a mythology of 36 Indian personalities plus 10 early Tibetan kings and emperors, all said to be previous incarnations of Dromtönpa, and fourteen further Nepalese and Tibetan yogis and sages in between him and the first Dalai Lama. In fact, according to the “Birth to Exile” article on the 14th Dalai Lama’s website, he is “the seventy-fourth in a lineage that can be traced back to a Brahmin boy who lived in the time of Buddha Shakyamuni.”

Avalokiteśvara’s ‘Dalai Lama master plan’

According to the 14th Dalai Lama, long ago Avalokiteśvara had promised the Buddha to guide and protect the Tibetan People and in the late Middle Ages, his master plan to fulfil this promise was the stage-by-stage establishment of the Dalai Lama theocracy in Tibet.

First, Tsongkhapa established three great monasteries around Lhasa in the province of Ü before he died in 1419. The 1st Dalai Lama soon became Abbot of the greatest one, Drepung, and developed a large popular power base in Ü. He later extended this to cover Tsang, where he constructed a fourth great monastery,Tashi Lhunpo, at Shigatse. The 2nd studied there before returning to Lhasa, where he became Abbot of Drepung. Having reactivated the 1st’s large popular followings in Tsang and Ü, the 2nd then moved on to southern Tibet and gathered more followers there who helped him construct a new monastery,Chokorgyel. He also established the method by which later Dalai Lama incarnations would be discovered through visions at the ‘oracle lake’, Lhamo Lhatso.The 3rd built on his predecessors’ fame by becoming Abbot of the two great monasteries of Drepung and Sera. The stage was set for the great Mongol King Altan Khan, hearing of his reputation, to invite the 3rd to Mongolia where he converted the King and his followers to Buddhism, as well as other Mongol princes and their followers covering a vast tract of central Asia. Thus most of Mongolia was added to the Dalai Lama’s sphere of influence, founding a spiritual empire which largely survives to the modern age. After being given the Mongolian name ‘Dalai’, he returned to Tibet to found the great monasteries of Lithang in Kham, eastern Tibet and Kumbum in Amdo, north-eastern Tibet.The 4th was then born in Mongolia as the great grandson of Altan Khan, thus cementing strong ties betweenCentral Asia, the Dalai Lamas, the Gelugpa and Tibet.

Finally, in fulfilment of Avalokiteśvara‘s master plan, the 5th in the succession used the vast popular power base of devoted followers built up by his four predecessors. Aided by his resourceful deputy Sonam Chöphel and his devoted disciple Gushri Khan, King of the Khoshot Mongols, as Dalai Lama he attained full and lasting religious and political power over the entire Tibetan plateau in 1642.

Thus the Dalai Lamas became pre-eminent spiritual leaders in Tibet and 25 Himalayan and Central Asian kingdoms and countries bordering Tibet and their prolific literary works have “for centuries acted as major sources of spiritual and philosophical inspiration to more than fifty million people of these lands”.Overall, they have played ‘a monumental role in Asian literary, philosophical and religious history’.

How the Dalai Lama lineage became established

Gendun Drup (1391-1474) was the ordination name of the monk who came to be known as the ‘First Dalai Lama‘, but only from 104 years after he died. There had been resistance, since first he was ordained a monk in the Kadampa tradition and for various reasons, for hundreds of years the Kadampa school had eschewed the adoption of the tulku system to which the older schools adhered. Tsongkhapa largely modelled his new, reformed Gelugpa school on the Kadampatradition and he also refrained from starting a tulku system. Therefore, although Gendun Drup grew to be a very important Gelugpa lama, after he died in 1474 there was no question of any search being made to identify his incarnation.

Despite this, when the Tashilhunpo monks started hearing what seemed credible accounts that an incarnation of Gendun Drup had appeared nearby and repeatedly announced himself from the age of two, their curiosity was aroused. It was some 55 years after Tsongkhapa’s death. When eventually the monastic authorities saw compelling evidence which convinced them that the child in question was indeed none other than the incarnation of their founder, they felt obliged to break with their own tradition. In 1487, the boy was renamed Gendun Gyatso and installed at Tashilhunpo as Gendun Drup‘s tulku, albeit on an informal kind of basis.

Gendun Gyatso eventually died in 1542 and the lineage of Dalai Lama tulkus finally became firmly established when the third incarnation, Sonam Gyatso (1543-1588), came forth. He made himself known as the tulku of Gendun Gyatso and was formally recognised and enthroned at Drepung in 1546. When he was given the titular name “Dalai Lama” by the Mongolian King in 1578, it was also accorded to his last two predecessors and he became known as the third in the lineage.

Photo Credit en.wikipedia.org

Advertisements

Krishnamurti – The Real Revolution (Best Speech Ever)

Jiddu Krishnamurti (/ˈɪd ˌkrɪʃnəˈmɜːrti/;11 May 1895 – 17 February 1986) was a speaker and writer on matters that concerned humankind.

By Nerti U. Qatja@VOP_Today


In his early life he was groomed to be the new World Teacher but later rejected this mantle and withdrew from the organization behind it. His subject matter included psychological revolution, the nature of mind,meditation, inquiry, human relationships, and bringing about radical change in society. He constantly stressed the need for a revolution in the psyche of every human being and emphasised that such revolution cannot be brought about by any external entity, be it religious, political, or social.

Krishnamurti was born in British India and in early adolescence, he had a chance encounter with prominent occultist andtheosophist Charles Webster Leadbeater in the grounds of the Theosophical Society headquarters at Adyar in Madras. He was subsequently raised under the tutelage of Annie Besant and Leadbeater, leaders of the Society at the time, who believed him to be a “vehicle” for an expected World Teacher. As a young man, he disavowed this idea and dissolved the Order of the Star in the East, an organisation that had been established to support it.

He said he had no allegiance to any nationality, caste, religion, or philosophy, and spent the rest of his life travelling the world, speaking to large and small groups and individuals. He wrote many books, among them The First and Last Freedom, The Only Revolution, and Krishnamurti’s Notebook. Many of his talks and discussions have been published. His last public talk was in Madras, India, in January 1986, a month before his death at his home in Ojai, California.

His supporters, working through non-profit foundations in India, Great Britain and the United States, oversee several independent schools based on his views on education. They continue to transcribe and distribute his thousands of talks, group and individual discussions, and writings by use of a variety of media formats and languages.

He was unrelated to his contemporary U. G. Krishnamurti, although the two men had a number of meetings. Click HERE – Full Life of Jiddu Krishnamurti

No More Fingers! ‘Brainprints’ to Be the Passwords of the Future

A team at Binghamton University found that each of us has a personal “brainprint” that can be detected with particular techniques. In an experiment reported in the journal IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, the researchers, led by Dr Sarah Laszlo, explained how they selected 50 volunteers and showed them various images.

By Nerti U. Qatja@VOP_Today

These included photos of “a slice of pizza, a boat, Anne Hathaway, [and] the word ‘conundrum,’ ” the paper explains. As each subject looked at the images, an electroencephalogram (EEG) machine was picking up the way their brain behaved.

The scientists found that each participant’s brain reacted in a different and specific way to the images shown. Building on that, the researchers managed to developed an algorithm which was able to match every person with their “brainprint” with high accuracy.

According to Laszlo and her colleagues, “brainprints” could become the passwords of the future. One could first be plugged to the EEG machine to record his or her particular “brainprint” as they look at some specific image, effectively setting a “brain pin code.” Then, every time that person sees that given image again, another EEG machine would cross-reference its brainwaves with a vast database to confirm their identity beyond any doubt.

This sounds like it could be a long and cumbersome way of creating one’s password, but in fact the experiment showed that all that is needed to accurately pick up the “brainprint” are three electrodes applied to the scalp.

And the technique’s reliability trumps its shortcomings: it would be practically impossible to obtain a “brain password” surreptitiously. Even if it happened, though. it would be very easy to just reset it by looking at another image. This gives the “brainprint” an edge on the majority of alternative biometrics-based identification systems.

“If someone’s fingerprint is stolen, that person can’t just grow a new finger to replace the compromised fingerprint — the fingerprint for that person is compromised forever,” Laszlo said.

“Fingerprints are ‘non-cancelable.’ Brainprints, on the other hand, are potentially cancelable. So, in the unlikely event that attackers were actually able to steal a brainprint from an authorized user, the authorized user could then ‘reset’ their brainprint.”

While using the “brainprint” as a new way to lock and unlock our computers or smartphones the technology is still decidedly far away, and could initially be rolled out only for the highest-security facilities — like the Pentagon or the vault of a central bank.

Learn How To Read Someone’s Mind

What if you could read minds… Impossible ? Think again. I Know What You’re Thinking…

By Nerti U. Qatja@VOP_Today


Learn how to Read Minds This technique is used by magicians like Criss Angel, David Blane and David Copperfield for mind reading tricks.


Whether we know it or not, we’re all street-corner psychics. Without the ability to divine others’ thoughts and feelings, we couldn’t handle the simplest social situations—or achieve true intimacy with others.

If a baby starts to cry several hours after drinking his last bottle, his mother knows precisely what he’s feeling: He’s hungry. But suppose a woman’s eyes brim with tears while she watches a DVD. Her husband sinks into the couch: What is she so upset about? She might tell him directly: “This movie is so tragic. It’s all about a doomed romance.” That may be true. But she could be thinking about how the story reminds her of her own marital troubles. Maybe she’s feeling hurt because she thinks her husband should realize what’s bothering her and acknowledge it. Or maybe she isn’t even aware that her real-world concerns are intensifying her reaction to the fictional couple.

Quickly and unknowingly, he scours his mental files—on his wife’s relationship history, on her reaction to the fight they had that morning, on the way she typically reacts to similar movies. He notes the particular quiver to her voice, observes the way she’s curled up on the couch, watches the expressions flickering across her face. He takes in information from all of these channels, filters it through his own wishes and biases… until finally it hits him: She knows about his mistress!

Every day, whether we’re pushing for a raise, wrestling with the kids over homework, or judging whether a friend really likes our latest redecorating spree, we’re reading each other’s minds. Drawing on our observations, our databank of memories, our powers of reason, and our wellsprings of emotion, we constantly make educated guesses about what another person is thinking and feeling. Throughout the most heated argument or the most lighthearted chat, we’re intently collecting clues to what’s on the other person’s mind at the moment. “It’s a perceptual ability I call mindsight,” says Daniel Siegel, UCLA psychiatrist and author of The Mindful Brain. “It allows your brain to create a map of another person’s internal state.”

Mind reading of this sort—not to be confused with the infallible superhero kind of telepathy—is a critical human skill. It’s the way we make sense of other people’s behavior and decide on our own next moves. Mind reading enables us to negotiate, compete, cooperate, and achieve emotional closeness with others. It lets us figure out when we’re being manipulated or seduced. It’s how we know when someone finds our jokes hilarious or is humoring us out of politeness. Mind-reading ability is perhaps the most urgent element of social intelligence.

Do it poorly and the consequences are serious: It can lead to conflict born of misunderstanding. It can make us feel lonely within a relationship. It can even incite violence: Abusive husbands typically—and inaccurately—attribute critical thoughts to their wives; that’s why they lash out. Difficulty divining others’ thoughts and feelings—”mindblindness”— characterizes autism and is what makes the condition so socially debilitating.

Decades of research on mind reading (or, as psychologists call it, empathic accuracy) now reveal how it works, who’s especially good at it, and how we can improve our ability to divine others’ thoughts—even when our conversation partners may not know their own minds. The thoughts and feelings of others, including those closest to us, are far from transparent; that makes mind reading the only way to know someone beyond the mere surface. It’s the only way to achieve true intimacy. And the only way to love someone for who he or she really is.

The Great Trade-Off

It’s astonishing that we can peer into each other’s minds at all—but in truth we generally don’t do it all that well. Strangers (who are videotaped and later report their second-by-second thoughts and feelings, as well as their assessments of their counterpart’s thoughts and feelings) read each other with an average accuracy rate of 20 percent. Close friends and married couples nudge that up to 35 percent. And “almost no one ever scores higher than 60 percent,” reports psychologist William Ickes, the father of empathic accuracy, who is based at the University of Texas at Arlington.

Our (limited) ability to mind read has ancient roots, says Ross Buck, a professor of communication sciences at the University of Connecticut. Over thousands of years of evolution, humans’ systems of communication grew more sophisticated, as living and working arrangements became more complex. Mind reading became a tool with which to “create and maintain the social order,” as Buck puts it. It helped to know when to affirm a commitment to a mate or defuse a dispute with a neighbor.

Of course, in order to advance our own interests, we still needed to conceal feelings from others at times, and even to lie. “We didn’t always want to show exactly what we were thinking, because others could use that to gain the upper hand,” says Buck. Our merely adequate mindsight, then, can be thought of as the product of a tug-of-war between the need to show and the need to hide our true selves.

This delicate balance between perceiving and concealing has served humans well over our long history, but Siegel worries that mind-reading ability is now on the decline in our culture. Today’s obsessed-with-success parents spend so much time stimulating their children with structured activities, noisy toys, and Baby Einstein DVDs, they are not sitting still and being “present” with their kids. As a result, they deny children the opportunity to learn how to get in tune with another person, physically and emotionally—that is, to develop mindsight. A reasonable degree of mindsight is required, he says, for a civil society in which adults are kind to one another.

Seven Sides of a Sixth Sense

If everyday mind reading is a sixth sense, it’s a very complicated one that relies on all the other senses and fully exploits our cognitive and perceptual abilities. For starters: When we’re trying to get inside someone’s head, we comprehend the meaning of the words being spoken, we monitor facial expressions and body language, and we register the tone of voice and the cadence of speech.

Not all mind reading moments are created equal, however. There are break points, times where the interaction changes color and tone. A break point could follow an awkward pause or the entrance of someone else into the discussion, explains Sara Hodges, a professor of psychology at the University of Oregon. We don’t have to pinpoint our partner’s every fleeting thought and emotion, but we’d better gauge these moments right, because they carry more weight. “If you’re reading someone pretty accurately but then miss the point where they go from laughing along with you to feeling teased in a hurtful way, or if you miss the point where a light conversation turns serious, then all your other points of accuracy may be blown, and it’s going to reveal that you’re not very empathically accurate.”

Reading body language is a core component of mind reading. It can reveal a person’s most basic emotions. Researchers have shown that when watching a body’s movements reduced to points of light on a screen, observers can still read sadness, anger, joy, disgust, fear, andromantic love. We’re primed to read emotion into movement—even when there’s very little to go on.

Facial expressions are also cues we use to know what others are thinking. Despite the 3,000 different expressions we may deploy each day, it’s the fleeting microexpressions that betray many feelings. Unfortunately, the vast majority of us are terrible at detecting them. Still, we tend to focus on others’ eyes, and that helps us. The many surrounding muscles make eyes a richer source of clues than other parts of the face: downcast in sadness, wide open in fright, dreamily unfocused, staring hard with jealousy, or glancing around with bored impatience.

We know even more about someone’s mind from the way the components of conversation fit together—someone’s words, gestures, and pitch of voice may seem either aligned or incongruous. But despite all we glean from body language and voice tone, Ickes finds, it’s the content of speech that contributes most to our success at mind reading. Words matter.

All Together Now

There’s yet another, deeper level on which mind reading happens. Emotions are in a sense contagious, and we may sense what’s on others’ minds by “catching” what our conversation partners are feeling. Psychologists have long known that we tend to converge emotionally with others as we talk to them; without being aware of it, we copy them, altering our physiology from the outside in. Like the method actor who “becomes” her character, we start to “feel” what the other person is feeling. When we mimic other people’s behavior, speech, rhythms, gestures, expressions, and physical attitudes, studies show, we gain a direct sense of their feelings and psychological attitudes as well.

Though smiles spread easily, negative emotions are more contagious than positive ones overall, probably because our brains are especially sensitive to negative information. And picking up someone’s anxiety or fear triggers our own fight-or-flight response, which gets our heart racing and blood pumping. Research has shown that those who are most susceptible to emotional contagion do better at reading a person’s negative thoughts and feelings than they do her sunnier ones.

Mind reading, however, is not a one-way process; it’s a dynamic interaction, and this adds an additional layer of complexity. Siegel conceives of mindsight as starting with interoception—a sense of our own bodies and inner state. The more self-aware you are, the more easily you will recognize, for example, that you are suddenly tense. You might attribute that to your conversation partner: “Jane must be on edge about her job.” And you may be right. If you begin to comfort her even before she’s said she’s worried about her career, you will come off as a caring, perceptive friend.

But you might be wrong. Jane could be fine while the tension you sensed was a figment of your own imagination. Say you grew up in a family where anger was not managed well, observes Siegel; you may tend to pick up on false threats. “Your internal mechanisms color your mindsight,” he says. All our particular prejudices, biases, and memory distortions also affect our mindsight. We may read ulterior motives into straightforward statements if we have a suspicious worldview. Or we may see good intentions in evil ones if our take on others is more optimistic.

Because there’s a direct correlation between having a good map of your own mental state and drawing accurate maps of other people, Siegel believes that attentiveness ormindfulness—which can be increased through practices like meditation—can “stabilize the lens of mindsight. It helps you see your interior world with more clarity. As you further develop mindfulness, you can look to your increased self-knowing as the material from which you draw empathic inferences.”

Skill at sensing your own feelings and interpreting all the clues your conversation partner is giving off qualifies you for truly advanced feats of mind reading: identifying those thoughts of which even the person having them is not aware. “The ability that separates the sheep from the goats, so to speak, is the ability to discern a thought or feeling the other person hasn’t yet fully recognized,” says Hodges. “They’re not lying or concealing their emotions, they’re just still sorting them out. And you can help them with that.”

Those who can do this are the most valuable kind of friend, the ones who can lead others to deep realizations about themselves. But they must guide gently, Hodges cautions. A comment like “It seems that you’re feeling a little sad about this—could that be right?” will be more readily accepted than a presumptuous “I know what you’re really feeling.”

ABC’s of Mind Reading

The ability to read minds actually begins at birth, newborns prefer faces to any other stimulus, and babies just a few weeks old are able to imitate facial expressions. By two months, infants can perceive and respond to the emotional states of their caregivers; by one year, “children monitor adults’ expressions and use them to guide their behavior,” reports Nancy Eisenberg, a psychology professor at Arizona State University and an expert on emotional development. At 2 years of age, children can infer others’ desires from the direction of their gaze; at 3, they can label facial expressions as happy, sad, or angry.

By age 5, children have acquired a rudimentary ability to read others’ minds; they possess a “theory of mind.” That is, they understand that other people have thoughts, feelings, and beliefs that are different from their own.

Children hone their mind-reading skills by eavesdropping on adult conversation, from which they discern the complexities of social rules and interactions. Play with peers provides opportunities to practice reading the minds of other kids, necessary preparation for knowing what’s going on in grownups’ minds. Such abilities unfold seamlessly in the normal course of development. But they may be impaired in abused or neglected youngsters. Children from violent homes, for example, may be overly sensitized to angry expressions, seeing anger where it doesn’t exist; severely deprived children, such as those raised in institutions, may lack the ability to clearly identify any emotions at all.

Sophisticated mind reading of the “I know that you know that I know” variety emerges only in late adolescence. That’s because the ability to hold in mind the subjective perspectives of several people at once—and to integrate what you understand of the world and of the particular person you are encountering—often requires a fully developed brain. The naturalnarcissism of teenagers may lead them to interpret others’ thoughts and feelings in the most self-centered way possible: When a mother panics because her daughter arrives a few minutes after curfew, the daughter will likely think “Mom’s trying to control me again!” instead of the more accurate “Mom is upset because she was worried about me.”

Surprise, Surprise

Ickes is eager to shoot down one of the oldest canards about mind reading—that women have some intuitive advantage. With UT colleague Tiffany Graham, he found “virtually no evidence” that women are better mind readers than men. So why the persistence of thegender stereotype? “It may be not an ability gap, but a motivation gap,” says Ickes. “In everyday life, women seem to be more easily motivated to try hard to understand what the other person is thinking and feeling.”

Support for such an interpretation comes from a study in which researchers offered cash bonuses to participants for accurately reading others’ minds. The payments “wiped out any difference between men’s and women’s performances,” suggesting that men can read minds as well as women when they want to. The trouble is they don’t always want to.

The role of motivation in accurate mind reading helps explain another counterintuitive finding: Newly married husbands and wives are very good at sensing each other’s states of mind. But just when we expect them to get even better at it, because they know each other more intimately, something unexpected happens: Empathic accuracy actually ebbs after the first year of marriage.

Why should those who know each other better do worse at understanding each other? They become a bit arrogant, confident that they know each other, and perhaps less motivated to put effort into reading each other, Ickes suggests. That lack of motivation may affect marital dynamics; sociological data show that marital satisfaction also plunges after one year. No matter how long you’ve been married or in a friendship, Ickes observes, assuming you know what someone’s thinking kills mind-reading accuracy.

Research on mind reading offers more surprises. You might think that high scorers on tests of sensitivity would be great mind readers. But they aren’t. Neither are professional listeners: A study of psychics found that they were no better at mind reading than the rest of us. Psychotherapists prove no more accurate than laypeople in making inferences based on facial expressions; however, they’re significantly more accurate in making inferences based on language.

And shared experiences (of, for example, new motherhood, alcoholism, or parental divorce) don’t help us get into other people’s heads—a fact that may come as a surprise to the millions of people who participate in support groups.

What Helps Can Also Hurt

So what does matter to effective mind reading? Advanced education, high intelligence (especially verbal intelligence), open-mindedness, and good mental health abet empathic accuracy. Everybody does better when reading people they know—but people who are better than average at figuring out strangers are also superb at reading those in their inner circle. Then, too, some people are easier to read than others. They talk more and use more gestures, providing the rest of us with a detailed map of their thoughts and feelings.

Of course, the same mind-reading skills that help you be a compassionate friend and supportive partner can be used to hit loved ones where it hurts. Think of a long-married couple who torment each other with intimate knowledge: He knows she’s thinking about her long-lost brother, and makes a quip about how she never took care of her siblings anyway; she senses he’s contemplating his business failures and confirms that he has in fact screwed up everything he’s ever tried.

For anyone in a relationship, the art of mind reading demands knowing when to probe and when to leave well enough alone, a strategy that calls for an old-fashioned virtue: discretion. Ickes calls it “managing” empathic accuracy. “Couples with discretion know when to go into their partner’s head, and when to stay the hell out,” he says. “You may have a pretty good idea of what’s going on in there, but you respect your partner’s boundaries, and your partner respects yours.”

That means letting your partner come to you sometimes, instead of jumping in and completing his or her mental sentences. It also means not overreacting to thoughts you’ve divined that are threatening, but fleeting: Your boyfriend may enjoy watching that attractive actress on the big screen, but it’s your hand he’s holding in the movie theater.

Fortunately, we get more than one chance to read someone correctly. A wise mind reader continually refines her initial assumptions about what someone else is experiencing. “The good friend isn’t necessarily the one who immediately understands—it’s the one who cares enough to keep trying to understand,” says Hodges. “You always have another chance to guess the other person’s thought or emotion, another chance to get in sync.”

Being in sync with another human being can be a transcendent experience, and one that’s worth the effort. To know another and to be known yourself, says Siegel, “is the heart of empathic relationships.”

Powers Of The Mind – (What we all can actually do!)

We all the this magnificent power. I believe the key ingredients are belief and intense, laser-like concentration!

By Nerti U. Qatja@VOP_Today


You have to see this video below to understand more yourself…

We created this channel to share one of the greatest secrets of the universe, and the secret is, we literally create our reality! (Quantum Physics now proves this) We are all governed by a set of Universal Laws, and these laws were created by GOD, to aid us in creating the life we desire. One of these laws is known as the “Law Of Attraction”, or the law of “Reaping and Sowing”. This law simply states, whatever you give out in Thought, Word, Feeling, and Action is returned to you. Whether the return is negative, or positive, failure or success, is all up to what you give out. Many authors and celebrities such as, Wayne Dyer, Oprah Winfrey, Will Smith, Jim Carrey, Steve Harvey, Rhonda Byrne, and many others has testified to this amazing Law Of Attraction. Its time you learn this wonderful secret…